A 'protégé', therefore, is a person who is under the protection of someone much older. In French, the word literally means 'protected'. Sachin Tendulkar, Mozart and Tiger Woods are examples of prodigies who shot into prominence at a very young age.Ī protégé, on the other hand, is someone who is supported by an influential person. These individuals are usually born with this talent it is not something that is learnt. A child who excels at something - tennis, singing, mathematics, etc. It is also possible to pronounce the first syllable of protégé like the word ‘pro’.
One of the ways of pronouncing the two words is ‘PRO-ti-zay’ and ‘PRO-di-ji’. The ‘g’ in ‘prodigy’, on the other hand, is like the ‘j’ in ‘jam’ and ‘juice’, while the following ‘y’ is like the ‘I’ in ‘hit’ and ‘bit’. The ‘g’ in protégé is like the ‘s’ in ‘measure’ and ‘pleasure’, and the final ‘e’ sounds like the ‘ay’ in ‘bay’ and ‘day’. The ‘o’ in in both words sounds like the ‘o’ in ‘got’ and ‘not’, while the following vowel is like ‘I’ in ‘sit’ and ‘bit’. If you navigate to the intersystem individual, you probably won't see the inferred value though.What is the difference between ‘protégé’ and ‘prodigy’?įirst, let’s deal with the pronunciation of the two words. At this point, you could run a DL query for “hasOmega value 42” to confirm that the individual has the desired property (make sure that you check the “Individuals” checkbox on the right): You'll need to select the Pellet reasoner from the Reasoner menu, and then select Reasoner > Start Reasoner. For some instance data, let's create and InterSystem, its S1, and assign the S1's complete value. You mentioned that you can use Pellet from within Protégé, so we're all set on that count. To see a place where the rules could be applied, we'll need some instance data and a reasoner. That's a good start, but it's worthwhile to see how it all works. Owl:qualifiedCardinality "1"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger Rdf:first [ a swrl:DatavaluedPropertyAtom
Rdf:first [ a swrl:IndividualPropertyAtom The Turtle serialization of the RDF representation of this OWL ontology (which you can save and load into Protégé) is: : rdfs: swrl: owl: xsd: swrlb: rdf. (In the version of Protégé that I'm using (not the latest), I had to Window > Create New Tab to create a Rules tab, and then Window > Views > Ontology Views > Rules to add the Rules list to the interface.) The multiplication here actually seems redundant, since you're multiplying by 1, so omega = alpha, in which case the head of that rule could simply be hasOmega(?i,?alpha). HasComplete(?s1,?complete) multiply(?omega,1,?complete) → If you declare domains and ranges on your predicates, then you won't need all the type predicates that appear in this rule, since they could be inferred from the property usage. The rule you'd want is along the lines of the following. To put in the mathematical constraints, you'll actually need SWRL you won't be able to enforce the constraint using other kinds of OWL axioms. You might also want to say that each InterSystem has exactly one associate S1 and S2: Here's a domain and range on the hasS2 property:
E.g., you might declare domains and ranges on your properties. In general, you'd start by defining the classes and the properties that you need:Īt this point you could add some axioms that govern how the systems have to interact, how the properties work, etc.
0 kommentar(er)
